Pretty good video, its biased against the 'theory' of a huge plane flying into the pentagon, tell me what you think.

http://www.tomhoffmanjr.com/vidpent.swf

owned.

~John

SO, if the plane didnt crash in to the pentegon where did it go??

chris

It hit the pentagon:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html

Nice flash vid though would make for a good movie. ;)

Very interesting. I dont know which to believe haha.

I'm not going to even bother watching that. There are numerous witness accounts of seeing the plane actually impact the Pentagon and/or a plane flying VERY low in the Pentagon's direction, and clear visible proof of the plane wreckage.

What would be the motive for making it look like a jumbo jet hit the Pentagon if it really didn't anyway?

Another observation-
On 9/11/01 I remember a guy on the news who heard/saw the plane flying overheard before it hit the pentagon, he said the plane throttled up before crashing.I doubt this was the case in the other accident pics where larger debris was shown.In the accidental crashes, they were more than likely moving at a considerable less speed.Since mass increases with speed, a plane moving at full/near full speed would leave considerably smaller wreckage(if any at all), than one moving at relatively low speed.

I am kinda curious why they would take all of the video's from all the camera's along the path of the "Plane" :stick: and have no evidence of the plan going by all these area's. :bs:

Yea that is kinda weird. Why wouldnt they release that footage? Also sure the fuselage of the plane would smash into nothingness because of its massive size and all the fuel, but why didn the wings just get clipped alon the building and crash to the floor.

Also in the part where they show the " missile/plane" crashing into the pentagon from the side, why does the plane look super tiny and also like 2 feet from the ground the entire time and it never left a skid mark on the ground at all.

Just kinda wierd.

So if I understand this correctly, the purpose of this video is to convince viewers that the government is lying to us and covering something up?

















What's new.

From my understanding, the plane didn't actually hit the pentagon.It hit the ground, and the explosion/shockwave/fire is what damaged the pentagon.

I don't know what the point of a cover up would be anyway.

There are just far too many internet conspiracy theorists.

I know for a fact that there was a plane that crashed into the pentagon, my sister was on her way to work taking her normal route in front of the pentagon when the plane flew right in front of her, she immediately pulled her car over and started screaming. then it hit.

That was the biggest waste of time I've ever seen.

I hope you guys file that theory next to "The world being flat", and "The Kennedy Rubber Bullet".



That's mocking the lives lost on that flight.



Follow up questions:

Where did the plane go? Did all those people just disappear?

They're probably on that island with Marylin Monroe, Elvis, and 2Pac.

Did Micheal Moore write this?

Seriously.

I thought it was funny ::shrugs::

well, there IS that guy now who sounds pretty much exactly like notorious b.i.g.

so elvis and 2 pack might still be around.


either way, WHO CARES what actually hit the pentagon. it was pretty badly damaged. not to mention everyone in the planes who died, no matter where they did or not, they are dead now.


i think this is a class project for Flash 101, know what i'm saying?

those pictures really make you think though. Your sister may have seen a plane that was about to drop a missle, and then fly off....

Im leaning more towards the missle vs a boeing commercial jet.

"Drop" a missile? Missiles have little engines in them that go Pssssssshhht! You fire a missile from a distance away, you don't drop it. You also don't use a low angle of attack like that if you are going to drop a bomb.