Tom's worst nightmare...
 

...another Bush!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...ling-in-texas/

Good looking resume if you ask me.

Re: Tom's worst nightmare...
 

The Republicans would have to be completely retarded to give him a nomination for President if he decided to run. After all the blame the Dems have put on the first two, there is no way he would come close to winning.

But I still think he'd be a better President than King Barack. :)

Re: Tom's worst nightmare...
 

He's preparing to run for state office, it'll be a long time before there's even a chance of him appearing on the national stage.

Re: Tom's worst nightmare...
 

The media will jump on any Republican, doesn't matter what their last name is.

Re: Tom's worst nightmare...
 

Frankly, I think it's a good move with Texas' high Hispanic population and the increasing importance of their vote (here and nationwide).

Re: Tom's worst nightmare...
 

LOL that would be the definition of "throwing an election".
I think the repubs already have their candidate in Chris Christy IMO. Unless he messes something up in the next 4 years, he can use his handling of Hurricane Sandy for a while.
Also, i think the repubs as well as the dems need to choose their candidate faster than using the whole primary debates and such, it saves money used to just get the nomination, and can work to their favor come time to spend money trashing the other party.
Romney having the clear advantage in fundraising and still needing to borrow $20 million to run his campaign is a true test to this.

Re: Tom's worst nightmare...
 

I agree...and not spend said money on trashing others within their own party in attempt for the primary bid. Although, everyone should spend more time and money focusing on what they have done, can do, and will do rather than all the negative ads and attacks.