Check it out - http://njdsm.asocialdisease.com/viewtopic.php?t=3650

I'm pretty impressed. If you 2.4 guys get your shit together, you'll be a force to be reckoned with.

Fuck ya. I want one.

Notice he's running a straight T4.

Most of us are still using the either the Mitsu or T3 housings.

-brian

very nice numbers. :jammin:

Here is the actual site so you don't have to click on 4 different links:

http://members.cox.net/brooksautomotive/ha...ld%20601whp.jpg

People who are literate do like to read. A dyno graph does not list mods and it doesn't include discussion concerning the car in subject.

Here are his mods:

Mods from his site:
1991 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX
Engine:
2.4 4G64 6 bolt block
Crower Rods
Ross 9:1 Pistons
Ported 1G head
Crower Springs/Retainers
HKS 272 cams
Induction:
Precision PT63 T4 turbo
Intake:
Extreme/Hogan's SM intake manifold
IRC Race FMIC
3" Buschur Upper Pipe
2.5" lower IRC piping
Tial BOV
Exhaust:
HKS T4 manifold
Custom T4 Downpipe/O2
Tial 40mm wastegate
Fuel:
Bosch Fuel Pump
Aeromotive FPR
1000cc Injectors
Stock fuel rail/lines
Engine Management:
AEM EMS
AEM WB O2
Ignition:
AEM C2DI
Custom Coil setup
Safety:
6 pt Chromoly cage
Sparco harnesses
Driveshaft Loop
Diest Transmission blanket
Fire Jacket
Snell95 Helmet
Driveline:
Stock transmission
Welded Center Diff
Suspension:
Sprint Springs
AGX adjustable shocks
Rims/Tires:
Volk TE37s 15x7
DOT Drag tires
Track Results:
Best pass: 10.81 @ 132.06mph
Best mph: 134.8mph
Says hes looking for low 10s at 140+ traps.

happy? I though you posted it so we could discuss it. Not look at other peoples discussions.

Why discuss something that's already been discussed?

I see a Dodge 2.4 bottom end, stroked to bored and stroked to 2.6ish Liters, with a reverse flowing neon head in a DSM... Heh... Dimond from Mitus, Star from Chrysler Motor companys real red headed step child!

EDIT: How can the Avenger/Eclipse Head fit the Mitsu 2.4 bottom end, now im really confused. I assumed that since I see a Neon/Avenger/EclipseRS valve cover, that its a Avenger Head, and then assumed that it can only bolt on to a Dodge block, as in Neon 2.0 or Stratus 2.4... Not to the Mitsu 2.0 or 2.4..

Hrm... any ideas?

Then why did you post it?

Then why did you post it? [/b][/quote]
PWN3D

He was informing us of something going on in the DSM world. You were just reposting the same stuff we could see elsewhere, therefore wasting space and making me use the little scroll wheel on my mouse just a little more therefore decreasing its lifespan... Thanks. I don't see how people can insist on barging in others people posts. Seriously.

The 2.6 engine in that thread is a boosted 420A. Totally different engine than what is being discussed.

Ahhh. well thanks for cleaing that up, I was very confused, cuz that head looked like a Mopar Head.

Hmmm...that 2.4 setup is basically the same as mine except the turbo (his is quite a bit bigger) and the intake manifold. It should be interesting! I actually hope I don't make that much torque, that is going to be hard on parts!!

2.4's rule.

Thats some pretty good numbers. Kinda low trap for 600awhp considering Nash is close to 130mph with 100fwhp less. I wonder how the stock tranny is liking all that torque and power. :) Not the quickest spooling thing in the world, but not terrible. Nash's 61mm on his little 2.0 is spooling faster than that 63 on the 2.4, especially considering the 2.4 is on an AWD dyno. The 2.4 is dropping power after 6500RPMs. That seems to be a reoccuring problem on a lot of the decent power 2.4 dynos that I have seen. On a 2.0 the same extensive list of parts would probably not start dropping power until past 8000+RPMs.

What do you think that could be? Head flow? Cams? I am guessing exhaust manifold, but it's only a guess.

I think those 132mph traps are from his old set up.

On Dsmtunes he said he can't wait to take it to the track this year to see what she'll run. Which implies he hasn't tested it yet.

-brian

Ither their is way to much displacement and not enough flow threw the head made for 2liters, or he is loosing power due to tunning with the AEM. If you are afraid to step outside the box and try new things, the ems is for sure not for you, unless you have thousands of dollars to pay someone else to set it up and tune it for you. I wounder why they let off at 35psi? thats when things start to happen.

~John