![]() |
question for the 3s guys
looking into getting a stealth TT this weekend.
the guy is claiming 450 awhp. i know theres a shit ton of variables but with these mods, do you guys believe 450 awhp is possible with this setup? im thinking more like 375-400 but thats just me. 1992 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin turbo AWD, Dynamic Racing stage II heads, 99 lifters, 6-speed Getrag from 99 vr4, Southbend Stage 4 DXD-B Clutch, TEC 15g's, Greddy blow off valve, Dejon Powerhouse Blow-Thru Intake Pipes, DSM sidemounts, Denso fuel pump, 550cc fuel injectors, Apexi SAFC, HKS VPC, Apexi AVCR, msd ignition dis-4, MSD 8.5mm wires, NGK coppers 1 stage colder, y-pipe, borla catback, ATR downpipe, highflow cat, Lowered, Nitto tires. |
Re: question for the 3s guys
car will also be coming from 7300ish elevation down to 2200 or so
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
the elevation change will have an effect. coming down should make it run better due to more oxygen i believe.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
Is that pump or race gas? what is he using for engine management?
Its doable on pump i wouldn't doubt it too much. |
Re: question for the 3s guys
Those injectors seem kind of small.
I guess you will have to test drive it, should give you a good idea on how much power it is making. |
Re: question for the 3s guys
not sure on engine management, and its on pump gas.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
"550cc fuel injectors, Apexi SAFC" I doubt it's at 450 with no timing control.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
The engine management would be the SAFC.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
Quote:
Has a HKS VPC too. Old school, but works good. As for making 450, it's debatable but not out of the question. The DR heads are a big help. Also if it was dyno'd at altitude with corrections, it will bump the #'s a little. |
Re: question for the 3s guys
Quote:
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
I say keep the camaro.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
the camaro gets about 8mpg, and its only a 3 speed. i need a car that can be a daily driver too.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
I would believe at least 350 which is good however you look at it.
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
the camaro has a built 383 stroker with eagle rods, pistons, crank. all forged
.510 lift cam 9.8:1 compression ratio. Dart iron heads Holley HP series 750 Double pumper carb MSD ignition, wires, and distributor. K&n Filter built th350 tranny. Overdrive has been removed. 3500 stall converter Aluminum flywheel B&M Megashifter ratchet style. 10 Bolt Rear end, brand new 4:10 gears 3:73 gears included. Posi LSD 30 Spline Axles Electric Fuel Pump Edelbrock headers 3" exhaust, hollowed out cat. (very mean sounding) Push Button start 200 Shot of nitrous Aluminum Radiator with electric fans. spohn racing torque loop spohn racing subframe connectors spohn racing adjustable torque arm |
Re: question for the 3s guys
I know for that every 1000 feet in elevation you climb, you lose 3% of your engines output capacity, and vice versa for descending in elevation, so you gain 3% every 1000 feet. So you should get a good bump in power going down 5000 feet; roughly 12-15% or so gain. But I don't know how they compensate for a tune. I'm almost positive you will have to get it re-tuned when you bring it back to your elevation. Atmospheric pressure @ 7000 feet is 11 PSI and @ 2000 feet it's around 13.5 PSI or so, and that's a good difference.
Just out of curiosity, are you buying the car somewhere in Wyoming? Any of the tuners here know what the deal is with getting a re-tune? |
Re: question for the 3s guys
He will have to get it retuned for sure...
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
thats what i figured because my friend has a 400WHP evo in littleton, co (~4000 ft) and hed have to get a retune if he were to bring it up to laramie (7400 ft)
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
ok so if the car is running rich in laramie will it lean out a little bit more if he brings it down here?
|
Re: question for the 3s guys
what im saying is i think he got it in wisconsin and it was tuned. then took it to laramie without retuning therefore running rich the whole time. so maybe returning to a normal elevation will bring it back closer to that optimal range.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.