![]() |
Check it out - http://njdsm.asocialdisease.com/viewtopic.php?t=3650
I'm pretty impressed. If you 2.4 guys get your shit together, you'll be a force to be reckoned with. |
Fuck ya. I want one.
|
Notice he's running a straight T4.
Most of us are still using the either the Mitsu or T3 housings. -brian |
very nice numbers. :jammin:
|
Here is the actual site so you don't have to click on 4 different links:
http://members.cox.net/brooksautomotive/ha...ld%20601whp.jpg |
Quote:
|
Here are his mods:
Mods from his site: 1991 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Engine: 2.4 4G64 6 bolt block Crower Rods Ross 9:1 Pistons Ported 1G head Crower Springs/Retainers HKS 272 cams Induction: Precision PT63 T4 turbo Intake: Extreme/Hogan's SM intake manifold IRC Race FMIC 3" Buschur Upper Pipe 2.5" lower IRC piping Tial BOV Exhaust: HKS T4 manifold Custom T4 Downpipe/O2 Tial 40mm wastegate Fuel: Bosch Fuel Pump Aeromotive FPR 1000cc Injectors Stock fuel rail/lines Engine Management: AEM EMS AEM WB O2 Ignition: AEM C2DI Custom Coil setup Safety: 6 pt Chromoly cage Sparco harnesses Driveshaft Loop Diest Transmission blanket Fire Jacket Snell95 Helmet Driveline: Stock transmission Welded Center Diff Suspension: Sprint Springs AGX adjustable shocks Rims/Tires: Volk TE37s 15x7 DOT Drag tires Track Results: Best pass: 10.81 @ 132.06mph Best mph: 134.8mph Says hes looking for low 10s at 140+ traps. happy? I though you posted it so we could discuss it. Not look at other peoples discussions. |
Why discuss something that's already been discussed?
|
I see a Dodge 2.4 bottom end, stroked to bored and stroked to 2.6ish Liters, with a reverse flowing neon head in a DSM... Heh... Dimond from Mitus, Star from Chrysler Motor companys real red headed step child!
EDIT: How can the Avenger/Eclipse Head fit the Mitsu 2.4 bottom end, now im really confused. I assumed that since I see a Neon/Avenger/EclipseRS valve cover, that its a Avenger Head, and then assumed that it can only bolt on to a Dodge block, as in Neon 2.0 or Stratus 2.4... Not to the Mitsu 2.0 or 2.4.. Hrm... any ideas? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
PWN3D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ahhh. well thanks for cleaing that up, I was very confused, cuz that head looked like a Mopar Head.
|
Hmmm...that 2.4 setup is basically the same as mine except the turbo (his is quite a bit bigger) and the intake manifold. It should be interesting! I actually hope I don't make that much torque, that is going to be hard on parts!!
|
2.4's rule.
|
Thats some pretty good numbers. Kinda low trap for 600awhp considering Nash is close to 130mph with 100fwhp less. I wonder how the stock tranny is liking all that torque and power. :) Not the quickest spooling thing in the world, but not terrible. Nash's 61mm on his little 2.0 is spooling faster than that 63 on the 2.4, especially considering the 2.4 is on an AWD dyno. The 2.4 is dropping power after 6500RPMs. That seems to be a reoccuring problem on a lot of the decent power 2.4 dynos that I have seen. On a 2.0 the same extensive list of parts would probably not start dropping power until past 8000+RPMs.
|
What do you think that could be? Head flow? Cams? I am guessing exhaust manifold, but it's only a guess.
|
I think those 132mph traps are from his old set up.
On Dsmtunes he said he can't wait to take it to the track this year to see what she'll run. Which implies he hasn't tested it yet. -brian |
Ither their is way to much displacement and not enough flow threw the head made for 2liters, or he is loosing power due to tunning with the AEM. If you are afraid to step outside the box and try new things, the ems is for sure not for you, unless you have thousands of dollars to pay someone else to set it up and tune it for you. I wounder why they let off at 35psi? thats when things start to happen.
~John |
He actually only ran it up to 32psi. It only says ported 1g head too, it doesn't say how much porting is done. It probably doesn't have oversized valves either.
It gives me hope though, I want to hit 600 whp, but would settle for 550 whp. I would like to keep torque under 500 ft/lbs if possible. I know it is going to spool really early with my turbo (3600?) so that may not be possible. |
Good luck keeping the trq down with that small exaust housing. My car made 464trq and 526whp at the first shop out in the middle of no where and exactly 10less hp and trq at Elite, so up that to a 2.4 and a turbo that will hit full boost befor 4800 and that meens a trq monster.
~John |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It just cracks me up how everybody has a fear of torque. :goodluck: Shepherd makes close to 1000hp and alot more torque than any of us will probably ever go after on the same drivetrain and his stays together. Torque is what makes a car accelerate, if you think you'll make too much then turn the boost down. It would be more forgiving and simpler to tune.
|
Nash hits full boost at 4300 on a 2.0. People have seen drop in spool from 500 rpm to 1000 rpm, so 700 shouldn't be a big stretch.
If you think shep is running a stock driveline, you are mistaken. He has mismatched parts from different years and also different axles. I also don't have a fear of torque. My fear is that my exhaust side is too small and it will be knocking down my HP while raising my torque. |
I don't know much about the setup other than what was posted in this thread and looking at the dyno chart. Does anyone know what tranny this guy is running? Is it a manual even? It says nothing about a clutch in his list and it does mention a tranny blanket which is more of an auto type mod. No scattershield is listed either. Just curious.
|
Quote:
|
hey, if you want a 2.6, get a g54b and find an HKS dohc head, they are only like 10,000 bucks. a steal.
|
Quote:
http://www.flamehq.com/albums/wpw-98/wtf1.jpg |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.