![]() |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Aww, no more baby turbo? :) Looks sexeh, I love the ef-series compressor wheels.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
How big is the EF2 inlet? 2.5"?
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Ooooh, shiny!
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
MAP EF2.5 installed and tuned by Cobb yesterday while I was in Austin, TX for an event.
426whp 393wtq 27.69 psig (peak) holding a flat 26 past redline. Still on 93-octane pump gas and stock cams! Solid gains over the EF2, but definitely lost some spool and response. This is with the 3" anti-surge cover, but MAP also sent me a 3" standard cover so I'm thinking if I swap that one on I'll gain back some spool and response. I'll talk to MAP about it and go from there. The car is definitely a beast for a DD, and I believe this is the farthest Cobb has ever pushed the stock cams and it's getting up there for pump gas numbers too. My previous results on the EF2 were 413/384; peak boost was right about the same, ~27psi. I think this is yet another good turbocharger option from MAP. While not replacing any of the current models, it's a good fit between the EF2 and EF3 as intended. small chart: http://www.mitsustyle.com/photopost/...o_tune0001.jpg big chart: http://www.dsmstyle.com/photopost/da...o_tune0001.jpg |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
So it's the EF2 wheels, just different housings?
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
So what size is the comp wheel?
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
It's the EF3's compressor wheel.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Tell Kevin or Calvin to get that shit up on the database!
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
I'm hoping Kevin gets it up tomorrow.
I just got back from a pretty good drive and the car really does rip and pulls hard all the way to rev-limiter! It drives really smooth throughout the RPM range, I'm giving thanks to the anti-surge for that. I would like to get a touch of response and spool back though, so I'm thinking it would be ideal to give up a bit of that smoothness in the name of response and swap over to the standard cover. I'm questioning whether this turbo actually needs the anti-surge ports. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
Quote:
My BBX had a stock compressor cover on it and was even bigger than this compressor setup so going back to a non-antisurge should work just fine. You have mivec to take away any surge that might 'just happen' from the conversion. Should add another 1-2% everywhere powerwise so you might just hit 430 :) Honestly I'm a tish skeptical if it will really help down low though but I really don't think it will hurt to try. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
That kind of power on stock cams and pump is very amazing. Very nice!
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Looks like it needs more boost thrown at it to better illustrate the difference.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Look like the ef2 is better. The spool up doesnt look all that great on the 2.5
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
I'm discussing with MAP and we have a few ideas on changes to try. This is why it's called prototype testing I suppose :D
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Yea I agree, for the "ultimate street turbo" you are after Kracka I don't see the advantage with the 2.5. Hell, my EF4 is only about 200rpms behind your turbo up to 27psi and I am not even on full mivec (obviously totally different setups, but still).
EF2 ftw on your car. /pray new cover helps. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Hughes you should run that thing down the 1/4 mile someday. I don't really care about the ET but i'm curious as to what sort of trap speeds it would pull.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.