![]() |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
RED = MAP ported exhaust manifold (SPC coated)
BLUE = MAP short-runner tubular exhaust manfiold (SPC coated) http://accessecu.com/dyno/graph.php?...rgb2=204000000 |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Crazy you make that much power on 93, badass.
You think the short runner might perform better with a bigger turbo or more RPM? Looks like the ported does perfect for everywhere on a street car. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Looks like an intelligent decision.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
BLUE = PPI "extreme" ported RED = MAP short-runner GREEN = MAP ported http://accessecu.com/dyno/graph.php?...rgb3=000153000 |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Damn! That or you should have gone to a long-runner instead of the short-runner mani!
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Ported stocker looks like a win to me. Not only dyno chart wise, but also keeps the setup simple / OEM under the hood which is always a plus in my book.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
I agree completely; plus it's much better for heat management, less risk of cracking, etc.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
I compared all of these manifolds, the short runner was huge gains over ported stocker at ~550whp, baseline was like 525, and with short runner it was 550ish.
I'd post it here but not the right thread. I agree though, on a stock turbo car the ported manifold is king. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
^Well my testing was on the FPblack, but I get what you are saying :)
I wouldn't ever run the short runner personally though, I like American welded things. But the design is solid. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
Kidding kidding, I'm done testing out exhaust manifold setups, I've made enough changes to that! Now if MAP were to place a Rev2/3 ported intake manifold in my lap... :D |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
It's making me want to stay with the FP cast manifold I have. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
The OEM manifolds ported work very well, they are a bit restrictive for sure, but spool up is always a good 400-500 rpms better with them and heat is managed better and you get to keep stock heatshields on the Evo X anyway.
Still made 570whp+ on the FPblack with one, it held it back for sure but was adequate. Both have great benefits. |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
New Girodisc S/S (orange) brake pads on the way...I don't need them yet, but they offered me an introductory price that's too good to pass up.
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-sal...-s-s-pads.html |
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Those sound awesome.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Quote:
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
^Sweet I have about the same amount of miles left if not more on my car, but it's all good parts store stuff.
|
Re: GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!
Hmmm...what is this?
http://www.mitsustyle.com/photopost/...m/IMAG0025.jpg http://www.mitsustyle.com/photopost/...m/IMAG0026.jpg A second compressor cover you say? http://www.mitsustyle.com/photopost/...m/IMAG0024.jpg Both covers have a 3" inlet for maximum airflow so that alone is a nice upgrade vs. the EF2, but we're also going to be testing standard vs. anti-surge to see how they compare. Stay tuned for data this weekend... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.