![]() |
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
however he did save quite a bit by doing a lot himself. |
Re: beaterX project thread
Local resources, friends, that's what makes stuff come together and keep it on schedule! I ran over to lomker's last night to beg/borrow this extra set of 4b11t headstuds he had after his debacle. Turns out to use a torque plate you need something to bolt it to the block with! Surprise! LOL Fail scheides.
So yea anyways, I ran the headstuds over to MAP last night. The block is done being bored and its finally excited about life again and ready to go have some fun! (get it? bored? I....nevermind.) Actually, it is getting its final hone today and then assembly begins. http://www.scheides.com/albums/evox-...ning.sized.jpg Side note, MAP has a 4b12 block, it doesn't look as beefy as the 4b11t. The caps holding down the crank only have 2 bolts (vs 4 on the 4b11t) and the rear main seal is different. They are going to try some parts-swapping from mine and theirs to just see what is possible. Maybe on my next build :) |
Re: beaterX project thread
Thats awesome to see it progress so quickly! It'll be a fun car for sure when it's all said and done.
Are you going to keep daily driving it with the built motor? |
Re: beaterX project thread
Give us a little spec sheet on this beast!!
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Nice progress, you are really moving!
What headstuds did lomker have, the ARPs? |
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
SOrry my last post was dumb, you guys can use reg. ARPs and they hold pretty good?
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Yes, people have ran upwards of 45psi on them so far, still holding fine. I'm running them at 37ish with no problems.
The evo's heads don't have lifting problems like DSM's do thankfully. |
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
I guess I assumed MAP would just have one or would've bought one. |
Re: beaterX project thread
progress looks great and your block definitely doesn't look "bored" haha. good one.
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Rods come in wednesday, motor is done machining and being assembled.
I think all gaskets are in from mitsu. Head will *hopefully* be done thursday or friday, I have my fingers mega crossed! Cams, valves, valvesprings, headstuds, and a new disc for the act 6-puck are in and ready to rock. Saturday night I sold my stock-ish FMIC, gonna ship it out tomorrow. I was kinda freaking out about what to do but finally a deal came through for me: http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...IMG_2617-1.jpg Buschur Race FMIC. 4.5 x 18 x 12 Garret core, 972ci--this is one of the biggest and best flowing cores on the market. I will have to do a wee bit of grinding to get it in but I will have one less excuse for pump gas powa now. :) This is step 1 to a bigger/later project I had originally planned to do over the winter involving the LICP, TB, and IM that has now been put off for a long, long time. Stock stuff will have to suffice I guess :D |
Re: beaterX project thread
you gonna have a nice lookin' grill yo! ;)
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Got Girth?
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Woot! getting closer!
|
Re: beaterX project thread
I am jealous of your speed :) Congrats, good core there for sure.
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
I did the math this morning, the new core vs the old core is 972ci vs 648ci, it is 150% the size of my old core but the same frontal area. |
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
Yea, 6 weeks for a shortblock sucked. Delays are great for saving money though :) |
Re: beaterX project thread
Nice core! Welcome to the Buschur Race FMIC club..hehe
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4085/...e0ce7604_z.jpg |
Re: beaterX project thread
That core is monsterous, 700whp?
|
Re: beaterX project thread
From garret's site I think it's p/n 703522-6004, supports 785hp and weighs 19.8lbs. Add some endtanks and I'm sure it'll be closer to 25. Or its the PTE core 051-1132 same specs and supports 975hp.
Either way it is a nice upgrade and will put concerns about the other intercooler to rest. |
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Usually you want a core that is rated for 50-100% more power than what you actually plan on making at the wheels, if you want it to not be a flow restriction and actually cool worth a crap. I have never had a car in with too big of an intercooler, but see cars with too small every other day.
|
Re: beaterX project thread
^Word, hence my old car having a core rated to 750whp and me making 450ish at most.
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
LOL check page2: http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1152&bih=542 Not like I'm going over the top or anything: http://i414.photobucket.com/albums/p...p/BMW/BMWb.jpg |
Re: beaterX project thread
meh. I'll suffer with the Perrin. It's 930, whatever hp that works out to.
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Forgot to ask--did you have appreciable wear on your six puck disk already? I was a little surprised to hear that you're replacing it.
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Bah, you guys and your big IC's, you guys ever gonna use that IC for the big powah? ;)
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Ok, acceptable, good excuse :)
|
Re: beaterX project thread
Like shane said, he's never seen too big of an intercooler :)
So I heard back from DeatschWerks just now. Man these guys are awesome to work with! Quote:
I just wish their 1300's weren't so noisy. I may end up getting them anyways--service like this is really hard to come by. I've had a ton of very positive back/forth with these guys on a set of second-hand injectors. Very impressed. |
Re: beaterX project thread
Any close ups of the external fin density/design on that core? While I agree a bigger IC is great, thickness is always a worry of mine on my setups. I won't ever run an extremely thick FMIC if the external fins are so densly packed that it seems that it is going to extremely inhibit flow to the radiator. Hence why I really like ETS cores as they don't focus 100% on intake charge cooling, but focus on street applications where keeping airflow through the core allowing enough air to the radiator is important as well. Garrett cores usually have a pretty dense external fin design from what I've seen.
Although it may not be as much of a concern considering you have an aluminum block now which may dissipate heat a bit better than the iron blocks... I'm just a worry wart when it comes to overheating, I can thank the old 1G for that :) |
Re: beaterX project thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.