Gt35r

[Goat Blower]

Have them make you an FP3565 then. :)
I'm thinking just a hair bigger. :D

[Shane@DBPerformance]

Gt40r

[1ViciousGSX]

Gt42r?

[niterydr]

I'm thinking just a hair bigger. :D
FP3565 with hair in the compressor cover?

[zxdude]

the gt35r will see 30 psi around 4000 rpms, much less than 30 psi means you picked the wrong turbo. a 60-1 will perform about the same but it will take longer to spool back up between shifts.

[sleepydsm]

the gt35r will see 30 psi around 4000 rpms, much less than 30 psi means you picked the wrong turbo. a 60-1 will perform about the same but it will take longer to spool back up between shifts.

Yeah, I know what you're saying, but I was thinking about the GT35R paired with a 2.4L eventually. I was kinda wondering if I could run that turbo on my 2.0L and if it would actually be able to be decent until I get to point of actually building a 2.4L.

[niterydr]

the gt35r will see 30 psi around 4000 rpms, much less than 30 psi means you picked the wrong turbo. a 60-1 will perform about the same but it will take longer to spool back up between shifts.
WTF?

[SlowWhite]

exactly My turbo doesn't hit full spool till about 5800rpms starts building boost at about 4K

My Dyno chart is located here:
http://www.scottbarton.net/Brian/Eclipse%20Test%20Page/

[JET]

WTF?
I agree. If you don't know much about turbo's, don't show it off to the whole world. Use some restraint and don't post. The GT35r would be a good turbo for both the 2.0 and 2.4. It will be good into the high 500's for HP.

[ther1pper]

Yeah, I know what you're saying, but I was thinking about the GT35R paired with a 2.4L eventually. I was kinda wondering if I could run that turbo on my 2.0L and if it would actually be able to be decent until I get to point of actually building a 2.4L.


same question for me