Log in

View Full Version : Iran and the "Deal"


Pages : [1] 2

1ViciousGSX
07-21-2015, 10:55 AM
Go!

AwdGSX13
07-21-2015, 11:58 AM
Pretty amazing what the Iranian president said about the deal afterwords. What a mistake by Obama... Should not do any deals with a country that hates us. Not to mention the arab countries we are allies with all are opposed to this deal as well.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/kerry-says-iran-vow-to-defy-us-is-very-disturbing/ar-AAdgNd9

1ViciousGSX
07-21-2015, 12:29 PM
I agree. No wonder Obama wants to bypass Congress on this, because it'll be just like Obamacare, the Devil's in the details. And his bypassing Congress is an impeachable offense, not that anybody cares, right? The more that comes out the worse it will be.

http://1389blog.com/pix/lets-stop-sending-money-to-the-middle-east-and-let-them-hate-u-s-for-free.jpg

SlowWhite
07-21-2015, 12:38 PM
I actually pray the first thing the next president does is undo everythinf obama ever did in office.

AwdGSX13
07-21-2015, 12:48 PM
I agree. No wonder Obama wants to bypass Congress on this, because it'll be just Obamacare, the Devil's in the details. And his bypassing Congress is an impeachable offense, not that anybody cares, right? The more that comes out the worse it will be.

http://1389blog.com/pix/lets-stop-sending-money-to-the-middle-east-and-let-them-hate-u-s-for-free.jpg

Pretty much, much more shit for him to screw up with the time he has left. Not to mention Iran will still be able to make nuclear weapons under this deal. It will just take much more time. "The Nuclear deal is designed to limit the amount of Uranium that Iran can get access to, such that they can do low-level enriching for power generation and other peaceful activity, without having enough to build weapons for at least 10 years." Stolen from Reddit but i thought it was a good analysis but the real question is if they are honest with their intentions?? I wouldn't trust them.

Speedfreak
07-21-2015, 03:10 PM
By restricting the amount of uranium they have access to effectively shuts down the ability to create nuclear weapons.

The concentration of uranium required for a nuclear power plant is different then what's needed for an explosive.

Their current need and policy is to increase their power generation as their public/infrastructure is in dire need. The uranium they have access to will have to go to this cause, as they are spending billions on building new plants for increased capacity.

I work in the Nuclear Energy sector. By opening up their programs/country to oversight, we are better of then having them do whatever they do without anyone around at all.

Anything can be spun in any direction anyone wants based on their own beliefs. That seems like what politicalstyle is all about these days.

AwdGSX13
07-21-2015, 03:15 PM
I'm just saying in the event over 10 years it could potentially have enough to create a nuclear weapon if it doesn't get used for what they say is all. I think the oversight is limited and doesn't allow inspectors into military bases though? So even if they were trying for weapons we wouldn't know. Just some things about the deal that make you ask questions.

1ViciousGSX
07-21-2015, 03:26 PM
Four letters of importance here:

I. C. B. M.

Speedfreak
07-21-2015, 03:28 PM
They'd have or build them regardless?

AwdGSX13
07-21-2015, 03:32 PM
They'd have or build them regardless?

Maybe? But, must not be too easy to get their hands on uranium if this deal is in question?