Log in

View Full Version : 2016 Presidential election


Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9

1ViciousGSX
06-18-2015, 01:50 PM
50/50 for me between Perry and Walker. Rubio looks like a sell out to me at times. Rand Paul is too inconsistent.

What's everybody's thoughts on Carly Fiorina? She doesn't look like a push over.

Who ever wants to win had better go after the liberal/ideology record hard.

Murlo26
06-18-2015, 01:54 PM
50/50 for me between Perry and Walker. Rubio looks like a sell out to me at times. Rand Paul is too inconsistent.

What's everybody's thoughts on Carly Fiorina? She doesn't look like a push over.

Who ever wants to win had better go after the liberal/ideology record hard.

Yep.

Goat Blower
06-18-2015, 02:00 PM
I'd probably say Walker as well at this point. Jindal would be my first choice when he throws in his hat.

AJ
06-18-2015, 02:04 PM
First one that comes out and bans the Kardashians from our lives and ship the Biebs back to Canada will have my initial ear. Not sure why people want to be president anymore the way shit is.

1ViciousGSX
06-18-2015, 02:09 PM
I like Jindal too, if he ever announces,..... We're getting the idea here that it might be coming soon.

1ViciousGSX
06-18-2015, 02:15 PM
I have no idea right now, my only concern is one of these guys will pull a Perot and split the vote handing it to another unqualified loon the dems produce.

This is so true.
Look at the Dems, Hillbilly is their choice. When was the last time you saw a large number of Dems running against each other? You don't because they know what splitting the vote does. And that's why all the "pile on" is going to hurt conservatives.

Trogdor
06-18-2015, 02:53 PM
I always have such a hard time finding someone who matches the way I think. The closest being libertarians; socially liberal, fiscally conservative. But at the core I think libertarian's believe people are good natured and will behave themselves when left alone. Where I think people fucking retarded and greedy when left to their own devices.

Kracka
06-18-2015, 03:02 PM
^I'd rather vote for my wallet than the warm fuzzies.

1ViciousGSX
06-18-2015, 03:40 PM
When I read the comments that Rick Perry is "too Texas" are you saying he's "too American"? "Too successful" because Texas is doing great while the liberal world crashes and burns?
I don't get that. That's what I would expect Hillbilly supporters to say, forget that they're from Arkansas,.... Reagan was a rancher, Bush Sr & Jr were from Texas, so I don't understand why any libertarian or conservative would think that's a bad thing.

Murlo26
06-18-2015, 03:42 PM
When I read the comments that Rick Perry is "too Texas" are you saying he's "too American"? "Too successful" because Texas is doing great while the liberal world crashes and burns?
I don't get that. That's what I would expect Hillbilly supporters to say, forget that they're from Arkansas,.... Reagan was a rancher, Bush Sr & Jr were from Texas, so I don't understand why any libertarian or conservative would think that's a bad thing.

I am not saying it's bad, just saying I don't think that he can win being that. At least that is what I meant by it.

NO sense in supporting someone who has no chance.

Realistically, our election system is supporting the lesser of two evils.

Like south park, a turd sandwich or giant douche or whatever they said lol.

That is referencing the actual election but Primaries aren't too different either as typically there is no "perfect candidate" and the one that comes close in my eyes usually has zero chance of winning so I don't bother getting my hopes up.