Diff Between Act 2900 6 Puck And 4 Puck

[slowbubblecar]

What is the difference between the act 2900 clutch with a 6 puck disk vs a 4 puck disk. Does one grab harder. I thought the 6 puck was pretty much race only. Which would be best for a daily driver?
Thanks

[CVD]

Originally posted by ghettostyle@Jun 4 2004, 10:30 PM
Which would be best for a daily driver?
Non puck, and even better yet, a 2600, unless you are going for 600whp on a daily driven vehicle...in which case, we all know it wont be daily driven for long.

[Super Bleeder!!]

i was gonna say something, but then cvd chimed in like an ass and talked all good.......and stuffs.....garr

[Raptor]

two pucks ;) (the difference that is)

Glad to be of help, let me know if there are any other math problems you are having trouble with.

[slowbubblecar]

which 2900 disk would be easiest to drive around town with. I thought there was a street disk, but I guess not. I was told there was only a 6 and 4 puck.

[MustGoFaster]

They both suck for street driving. But get the 4 puck if you must get one :goodluck: on having anything in one piece.









I must say that that is horrible advise and you should not get a pucked disc. There is a reason they don't offer the 2900 with the street disc, cause you don't really need a 2900 if your getting a street disc.

[slowbubblecar]

what could hold a lot of power that is streetable?

[1ViciousGSX]

A puck clutch disc with a sprung hub is not as bad on the driveline. More pucks is not always better. I have a ClutchMasters 2500 with a 4 puck sprung hub and I like it. And it's good to 600+hp.

[MustGoFaster]

The 2600. It will be fine for 500whp or less. To much more than 500 and you are starting to push the limits of the clutch.

One major reason the ACT pucked discs are something to avoid is the lack of springs and they are on the agressive side of things. (really bite into the PP an FW).

[Kracka]

CVD gives good advice.