Log in

View Full Version : this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?


Pages : [1] 2 3

M1L3S
01-30-2013, 02:56 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTeHMaNO5to&feature=youtube_gdata_player



for big turbos this sounds like it would be nice, im not familiar with intakes at all. are there better options , that still give good low end ?

but you know what they say "just one more moving part to break" (has anyone ran this setup?)


just looking for options on the rebuild.

evotuner
01-30-2013, 06:35 AM
thats pretty sweet, dsms forever evolving!!

scheides
01-30-2013, 07:36 AM
I was going to run one of those years ago on my 2G but opted out. End of the day once you are making decent power, this is a restriction and it'd have to go bye-bye anyways :)

DSMINMN
01-30-2013, 08:30 AM
I've always been curious about these. They seem to be a little too expensive as everyone wants gold for them. I can understand why though. It would probably be decent on a 16g or equivalent car.

Tachyon
01-30-2013, 09:08 AM
They work well.

Here's a dyno of a 16g gas setup from 2007:

http://i.imgur.com/4ZOedzc.jpg

Blue line is the Cyclone, red is a 1G Stock manifold.


The record for max power on a Cyclone was 621 HP on a DJ using a laggy GT-35:

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f397/lancerman/yellow%20car/621HP.jpg

I suspect like scheides said, it would be a restriction on high-flow setups, but I have absolute data from back-to-back runs with the same setup.

M1L3S
01-30-2013, 01:27 PM
They work well.

Here's a dyno of a 16g gas setup from 2007:

http://i.imgur.com/4ZOedzc.jpg

Blue line is the Cyclone, red is a 1G Stock manifold.


The record for max power on a Cyclone was 621 HP on a DJ using a laggy GT-35:

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f397/lancerman/yellow%20car/621HP.jpg

I suspect like scheides said, it would be a restriction on high-flow setups, but I have absolute data from back-to-back runs with the same setup.











so for a 2.3 hx40 build , wanting 500ish do you think it would be a benefit or a restriction?


ive read that it out flows a 1g , but not by much.

seeing how my engine is already a 2.3 I figured the cyclone would give even more grunt in the low end before boost steps in.

blackrosenova400
01-30-2013, 01:44 PM
Im running a cyclone intake on my 2.3 with an actuator just like in the video. Automatic with stock cams and a bastard 20g at 32-35 psi. It is a nut case out of the hole.

Im also going to further the actuator setup by adding a boost control solenoid and controlling it with my evo 8 ecu so that it only opens the butterflys at 4000 rpm.

Tachyon
01-30-2013, 01:55 PM
so for a 2.3 hx40 build , wanting 500ish do you think it would be a benefit or a restriction?


ive read that it out flows a 1g , but not by much.

seeing how my engine is already a 2.3 I figured the cyclone would give even more grunt in the low end before boost steps in.

With an HX-40 I would use a SMIM over the Cyclone because the turbo can supply sufficient airflow that it makes sense to make the engine more efficient in the upper RPM range.

blackrosenova400
01-30-2013, 02:19 PM
With an HX-40 I would use a SMIM over the Cyclone because the turbo can supply sufficient airflow that it makes sense to make the engine more efficient in the upper RPM range.


I agree, it would not be a good choice for comparing it to a smim for 1/4 mile drag racing and overall power. But for a fun street car, and maybe the 1/8th mile, I like it!

blackrosenova400
01-30-2013, 02:31 PM
http://www.mitsustyle.com/photopost/data/500/medium/IMG_00252.JPG

FYI: It was a pain to clear the A/C compressor, and it was a pain relocating the coil pack and setting up the wastegate actuator.

You can kind of see the wastegate actuator under the spark plug wires.