Presidential quiz

[A//// Guy]

http://www.isidewith.com

Who knows how accurate these things are.. plus politicians flip flop like crazy so it wont be accurate based on that alone. Also, Ron Paul isnt on here.. so im sure that would be my top match.

Mitt Romney Republican
on economic, domestic policy, social, and immigration issues
81%
Gary Johnson Libertarian
on domestic policy, healthcare, and immigration issues
66%
Barack Obama Democrat

Another: http://www.selectsmart.com/president/

1. Ideal Theoretical Candidate (100%)
2. Mitt Romney* (63%)
3. Barack Obama* (61%)
4. Jill Stein* (55%)
5. Joseph Biden (54%)
6. Newt Gingrich (53%)
7. Robby Wells* (53%)
8. Rick Santorum (49%)
9. Ron Paul (48%)

Who knows! lol

[Goat Blower]

I find it to be pretty easy with two candidates that are very different from each other. :D

[A//// Guy]

Take the quiz and show us those results :)

Similarities and differences between Romney and Obama http://www.isidewith.com/obama-vs-romney-on-the-issues

The following boggle my mind, wtf Romney?

Is Global Warming a threat to the environment?
Barack Obama: Yes
Mitt Romney: No, global warming and cooling are natural cycles beyond our controlP2 C4

Should U.S. National Parks and Forests continue to be preserved and protected by the federal government?
Barack Obama: Yes, and expand the government’s domain to protect more landP3 C4
Mitt Romney: No

[Goat Blower]

I agree emphatically with Romney on the first one, not sure about the second, but I sure as hell wouldn't expand the government's domain, they can't afford to keep up what they already have.

[tehehodi]

I got Jill Stein than Obama.

That makes me a hippie right?

[A//// Guy]

I agree emphatically with Romney on the first one, not sure about the second, but I sure as hell wouldn't expand the government's domain, they can't afford to keep up what they already have.

While climate change is real, we definitely don't help it with a human presence of pollution, you cant deny that we not hurting the environment..

While expanding I dont agree with right now, taking away from protecting land is not right.

There is no perfect candidate for me. Obamney seems like one unit in a lot of aspects.

[niterydr]

87% Gary Johnson
81% Mitt Romney
74% Virgil Goode
63% Barack Obama
on quiz one.
1. Ideal Theoretical Candidate (100%)

2. Mitt Romney* (68%)

3. Rick Santorum (56%)

4. Newt Gingrich (54%)

5. Barack Obama* (53%)

6. Jill Stein* (49%)

7. Ron Paul (47%)

8. Gary Johnson* (46%)

9. Joseph Biden (44%)

10. Rick Perry (44%)

11. Michele Bachmann (42%)

12. Herman Cain (39%)

13. Robby Wells* (37%)

14. Tim Pawlenty (37%)

15. Stewart Alexander* (37%)

16. Donald Trump (33%)

17. Kent Mesplay (31%)

18. Jon Huntsman (29%)

19. Rocky Anderson* (23%)

20. Michael Bloomberg (22%)

21. Buddy Roemer (14%)

Quiz 2

[1ViciousGSX]

My results:

Gary Johnson 81%

Mitt Romney 73%

Virgil Goode 58%

Barack Obama 19%



74% Libertarian

70% Republican

37% Democrat

16% Green

[Super Bleeder!!]

isidewith results:

Barack 89
Jill Stein 75
Mitt 72
Gary J 65


Green 79%
Democrat 79%
Republican 62%
Libertarian 44%

[1ViciousGSX]

You guys who are "Greenies", do you realize that it doesn't matter? We all breath the same air and the oceans all blend together, there's no vertical wall that separates heavy polluting countries from us and the rest of the world. China has some of the worst environmental regulations, if any at all, yet we have let ourselves be sold out to them. Why have we let American companies move their production to those countries, why hasn't our government banned the importation of products from those "dirty" countries if the environment is so important? Why has our government used outrageous and overbearing EPA regulations to stop us from producing products here, if China can get away with it unchecked?

So I ask again, why does it matter?