One car, same tune - 3 dyno sheets.

[Goat Blower]

That sounds right. I dynoed 520awhp at DB and 582 at MAP, but it didn't feel quite right at MAP.

[Shane@DBPerformance]

My wife's 1G put down 485 at DB and then 563 at MAP.

[Murlo26]

My wife's 1G put down 485 at DB and then 563 at MAP.

I think this has to be the norm 14-17% area. Mine was terrible for a comparison, 420 DB, 460 MAP. But I was running 3 less pounds of boost.

Is the wife's 1g on a MBC shane? I am thinking that my boost control method is to blame.

[RS98GSX]

Just goes to show that dynos and conditions can change things!

MAP=340whp
RS= 323whp
DB=285whp

Add in some weather/wear fudge factors but this is pretty neat comparo.


Ron does an awsome job tuning. and the dyno at RS is a low reader, I wouldnt doubt it if you calculated in the percentiges if RS was real close with numbers to MAP.

[Shane@DBPerformance]

Ron does an awsome job tuning. and the dyno at RS is a low reader, I wouldnt doubt it if you calculated in the percentiges if RS was real close with numbers to MAP.

All three dynos on that car were with the same tune.

[mlomker]

my boost control method is too lame.

ftfy. I guess the real question is what is it hitting on the streets.

[Murlo26]

ftfy. I guess the real question is what is it hitting on the streets.

zero now ;)

We logged it after the DB tuning session and the loads etc were almost identical to the dyno session.

[simulatedwood]

ftfy. I guess the real question is what is it hitting on the streets.


I wish I knew, no boost guage.

The tune was directed to be very conservative from the start. I am sure there is a bit more power that could be sqeazed out, but my wallet cannot afford to go there.

:drive1: