Log in

View Full Version : Engaged or Disengaged?


Pages : [1] 2

TheBlizzard
07-25-2007, 11:44 AM
No, this isn't from the spring issue of Blushing Brides magazine. This is a whole different type of "ENGAGEMENT". Employee engagement has to do with how committed employees are to the success of their organization. It’s a slight but significant refinement of employee satisfaction.

How is it different?

The thinking behind measuring engagement is that just because an employee is satisfied it doesn’t mean that they are working hard or doing a good job.

An employee may be satisfied because they make a decent salary, have good benefits, have a nice boss, and have a schedule that fits their needs. They may also do a mediocre job, not poor enough to get disciplined or fired, but not providing great guest service or outstanding quality.

In fact, their satisfaction may be higher because they don’t have too work hard. Yes I just said that and you know its true.

Engagement is a way of measuring how the employee feels about working for the organization, how strongly the employee identifies with the company and its goals, and how much the employees accepts and lives by the values of the organization. In short, does the employee act like an owner or a hired pair of hands?

Employees fall into one of three different categories: engaged, not engaged or actively disengaged.

Engaged employees are defined as people working with passion and feeling a profound connection to their company. They drive innovation and move the organization forward.
Employees, who are not engaged, are essentially “checked-out” and sleepwalking through their workday, putting time – but not energy or passion – into their work.

Actively disengaged employees are not just unhappy at work, they are busy acting out their unhappiness and undermining what the engaged workers accomplish.

Research has shown that only about 27% of employees in America are engaged while 59% are unengaged and 14% are actively disengaged. It estimates that the annual cost to America’s economy of the 22 million actively disengaged workers is $300 billion.

Measuring Engagement

How do you know how many of your employees are engaged?

Engagement is measured by doing an employee survey (similar to an employee satisfaction survey), but asking questions related to engagement.

There are two types of questions that can be used to measure engagement. Questions can be asked about:

1. How the employee feels about the organization.
2. The employee’s perceptions of behaviors within the organization that demonstrate engagement.
Examples of questions that could be asked about how an employee feels about the organization:

I feel like an owner of the company.
I am proud to work for _____.
I would recommend ____ as a great place to work.
There is nothing saying that anyone will answer any of the questions honestly; however it may make them come to some self realization about self issues.

These are examples of answers that demonstrate positive employees’ perceptions of behaviors within the organization:

I often “go the extra mile” to provide excellent service to our customers.
Employees in my department are committed to doing high quality work.
Managers and employees in my department work together to improve customer service.
What Gets Employees Engaged?

Questions like the ones above can help leadership measure current levels of employee engagement, but the bigger question is how to increase employee engagement.

The main driver of employee engagement is quite simple: Does the employee feel valued and involved at work.

Specifically some of the key ways that management can engage its employees are:

Communicating clear performance expectations and providing honest and timely feedback on performance.
Listening and responding to employee concerns.
Providing employees with learning opportunities that help them realize their potential. These don’t have to be formal training courses; they can be “learning on the job” – finding ways to overcome challenges and perform at higher levels on regular daily responsibilities.
Focusing on strengths instead of weaknesses. There is a positive energy toward improvement and engagement that is created when managers help employees develop their strengths while supporting them in areas in which they are weak.
Caring about employees’ overall well-being.
So in addition to measuring the current levels of employee engagement, it makes sense to measure employees’ perceptions in these five areas, so that the current status of organizational practices can be known and tracked over time.

The potential financial impact of greater employee engagement is huge because it combines the savings from lower employee turnover with the increased revenue from greater customer satisfaction (from receiving better service).

So my question to the MitsuStyle is; collectively how is the employee base where you work? Or have you worked in places that employees are generally engaged, disengaged, or actively disengaged. I recently have been asked of my GM to evaluate our department to find out if we are spending our money wisely when it comes to staffing. And if we have the best leaders in place.

Personally I find it interesting on how many people generally have a negative attitude when it comes to the place they work.

polishmafia
07-25-2007, 11:58 AM
we've done these same types of surveys, especially in our production departments.

most of them hate their jobs, hate their boss, hate the benefits, and want more pay.

but...

-most of them make low-30s for basic data entry with only a high school diploma required
- dislike their bosses for reasons like they get in trouble when they come in late or take long lunches
- pay a measley amount per pay check for benefits, even though the deductible is high, its still lower than the majority of benefit programs out there.

so the stats about how many are disengaged i would say is absolutely spot on when it comes to my company.

polishmafia
07-25-2007, 12:00 PM
forgot to add...

Personally I find it interesting on how many people generally have a negative attitude when it comes to the place they work.

x2

if you dont like, go find something else.

TheBlizzard
07-25-2007, 12:08 PM
Where I work it seems like most people are alway bitching and complaining about something that doesn't even pertain to them; always worrying about what other people are doing when they don't do shit themselves.

They get pissed off when boss's tell them they can't take a fucking smoke break every half hour or take 2 hour lunch. God for bid if they actually have to apply themselves for atleast half the day make atleast 17.50 per hour which is the base pay for a Slot Tech here.

And a good rule of thumb is that the people that are complaining about others that are engaged are most likely actively disengaged themselves.

Matt D.
07-25-2007, 12:26 PM
Good read. I sometimes wonder if I slack too much, but in the end I do get a lot done, often stay late or eat lunch at my desk, and am willing to do whatever needs to be done to make a user satisfied. My boss is awesome, my coworkers are awesome, and everyone else in this company is happy. The company itself is profitable and is still on top of this niche market while competitors are popping up trying to copy our products but can't match our quality. Can't say I'd rather work anywhere else right now.

Enes
07-25-2007, 01:12 PM
many people at IBM are not engaged, mostly due to company loyalty towards their employees. IBM for last 3 years has ALWAYS found an excuse not to give out raises. They set unrealistic goals for profit margins and if those goals aren't reached no one gets a raise.

This year we acheaved our raise, so they found another excuse to not give out raises. They said, we are eligible for raises if their market assesment team finds out that we are being Underpaid for what we do.

SOO an internal team would do market assesment for each job position to see depending on the market if your position is underpaid or not.

Thats all fine and dandy but their "underpaid" qualification means you have to be making 15% less than average person in your position.

lets just say only managers got their raises AGAIN this year for 7th year in a row! while one of our executives got a 350 million bonus.


-E

MustGoFaster
07-25-2007, 01:22 PM
I think the numbers would seem accurate. I have been in all three groups at one point in time or another, with just about every employer I have worked for. If I find myself in the actively disengaged category for a length of time, I start looking for a new job. Being miserable for half you day sucks, and so far every time I have switched jobs I have gotten paid more. I would say that my engagement at my current job varies by project, some suck ass and I don't want to have anything to do with them, others are "just work" and others are enjoyable. Having a variety of jobs/work can be a good thing or a bad thing.

Outlaw1
07-25-2007, 01:24 PM
Thankfully there are people that are disengaged. It leaves room for someone like myself climb the ladder to a point where I make way more money than I should.

Thanks!

TheBlizzard
07-25-2007, 01:36 PM
Thankfully there are people that are disengaged. It leaves room for someone like myself climb the ladder to a point where I make way more money than I should.

Thanks!

Exactly.

Jana
07-25-2007, 02:59 PM
That was a great post Craig!! I'm impressed :D

I would say I'm currently engaged with my new position. I would say that about 90% of the employees here are engaged, maybe 8% are disengaged & the other 2% are actively disengaged. We have a pretty high morale, and a fairly low turnover rate for our industry (software developer).