PDA

View Full Version : 2.3L vs 2.4L

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
CDeutsch
03-16-2006, 02:05 PM
Yeah I know, probably the thing I love the most on dsmstyle.
Its the only "dsm" board that is all about theory. The other board like this where the "professors" come out of the woodwork is 3si.org.....and that board is way to damm big to get in on alot of the stuff.

LMAO. They should turn that into some type of slogan. I can only take 3Si.org in small doses, but the board is so huge it only comes in mega-size doses.
sleepydsm
03-16-2006, 04:22 PM
Tis is a lot of interesting information! I almost want to start over with a stock dsm, and make a built tranny and engine my first mods. you could maybe tool around in that car while you collect everything for you large turbo.
rst95eclipse
03-17-2006, 12:03 AM
A few years back, a friend of mine made the infamous 2.7L DSM engine and ran it around with a 14b.
I'm new to the 4g series. Don't know too much about internals (leave it to the machine shop). How would you stroke a 4g64 into a 2.7L? Is there a kit out there?
Super Bleeder!!
03-17-2006, 12:14 AM
No
rst95eclipse
03-17-2006, 12:24 AM
Care to explain?
Jakey
03-17-2006, 08:43 AM
A few years back, a friend of mine made the infamous 2.7L DSM engine and ran it around with a 14b. He said it had no issues and went like a bat out of hell. I didn't see it personally, so it might or might have not been true. :p

Ah yes, Mark at PowderBlast Co., right?

I'm surprised that nobody has brought 2.1s into this thread.
At-Least-It's-An-Evo
03-17-2006, 10:03 AM
Ah yes, Mark at PowderBlast Co., right?

I'm surprised that nobody has brought 2.1s into this thread.


Mark Crook :) Sold me a good shitty motor though... but nonetheless, it was redone.

2.1, schmoo one. No one's got a tranny to shift it or wants to pay for one; meh.
sleepydsm
03-17-2006, 10:13 AM
Mark Crook :) Sold me a good shitty motor though... but nonetheless, it was redone.

2.1, schmoo one. No one's got a tranny to shift it or wants to pay for one; meh.

Cher is definately right, the 2.1 can rev and most DSM trannys couldnt shift at that high of RPM, unless they had a dogbox.

Is that when your bought that built 2.4 off the MN dsm list? I remember it for sale, and some asian kid bought it...
niterydr
03-17-2006, 11:09 AM
No point to rev a dsm that high. The transmission don't keep up, and they stop making power at high horsepower.
At-Least-It's-An-Evo
03-17-2006, 11:34 AM
No point to rev a dsm that high...and they stop making power at high horsepower.

Not necessarily true. You know with the right headwork and turbo/setup, it will make power to redline. Examples: Brent and Shep.